Paul Prays for a Dead Man!

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

“Give me one verse—just one verse—in the Bible where a living person prays for a dead person.”

If you’ve ever had this challenge thrown at you by a Protestant friend, you’re not alone. It’s a common gotcha question designed to suggest that praying for the dead is some Catholic invention with no basis in Scripture. But here’s the thing: there is such a verse, and it’s right there in Paul’s second letter to Timothy.

The Verse Every Catholic Should Have Highlighted

In 2 Timothy 1:16, 18, Paul writes: “May the Lord grant mercy to the household of Onesiphorus… May the Lord grant him to find mercy from the Lord on that Day.”

This is Paul—the Apostle Paul—praying for Onesiphorus. And the evidence strongly suggests that Onesiphorus was dead when Paul wrote these words. Notice how Paul prays for “the household of Onesiphorus” (present tense, living family members) but then shifts to praying that he (Onesiphorus himself) might “find mercy on that Day”—a reference to the Day of Judgment.

This is a verse every Catholic should have underlined in their Bible.

Why Prayer for the Dead Makes Sense Only if Purgatory Exists

Here’s the logic that many people miss: praying for the dead only makes sense if some intermediate state exists. Think about it. It would be futile to pray for those in hell—prayer can’t help them; it’s too late. And it would be unnecessary to pray for those already in heaven—they have everything they need. But if purgatory exists, then prayers can genuinely aid the faithful departed in their journey of purification toward the beatific vision.

Even C.S. Lewis, the beloved Anglican author, believed in prayer for the dead. In Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer, he wrote: “Of course I pray for the dead. The action is so spontaneous, so all but inevitable, that only the most compulsive theological case against it would deter me. At our age, the majority of those we love best are dead. What sort of intercourse with God could I have if what I love best were unmentionable to Him?”

That’s powerful stuff from a non-Catholic.

Protestant Scholars Who Admit Onesiphorus Was Dead

What’s fascinating is how many Protestant commentators actually admit that Onesiphorus was likely dead when Paul wrote this prayer. Presbyterian scholar William Barclay wrote: “There are many who feel that the implication is that Onesiphorus is dead. Now, if he was dead, this passage shows us Paul praying for the dead.”

Reformed church historian Philip Schaff agreed: “On the assumption already mentioned as probable, this would, of course, be a prayer for the dead.”

Lutheran commentator Johannes Bengel thought Onesiphorus was dead. Baptist Greek scholar A.T. Robertson said: “Apparently Onesiphorus is now dead, as implied by the wish in 1:18.” (Notice how Robertson calls it a “wish” instead of a “prayer”—a fascinating word game to avoid the obvious implications!)

More recent scholars continue this trend. Gordon D. Fee (Assemblies of God) and Murray J. Harris (Evangelical) held that Onesiphorus was dead or likely dead. Craig Keener (Baptist) and I. Howard Marshall (Methodist) took neutral stances or thought it possible.

The Circular Reasoning and “Papist” Scare Tactics

Now, not all Protestant commentators are so honest with the text. Some resort to what can only be called circular reasoning. The classic commentary by Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown states: “Nowhere has Paul prayers for the dead, which is fatal to the theory that he was dead.”

Read that again. Their argument is essentially: “Paul wouldn’t pray for a dead person, therefore Onesiphorus isn’t dead.” That’s not exegesis—that’s assuming what you need to prove!

Matthew Henry’s commentary is even more revealing: “Though the papists will have it that he was now dead… but who told them that Onesiphorus was dead?” Albert Barnes writes similarly: “This proves that Onesiphorus was then alive, as Paul would not offer prayer for him if he were dead. The Papists, indeed, argue from this in favor of praying for the dead… But there is no evidence of that.”

Do you see what’s happening here? The word “papist” is being used as an interpretive scare tactic. The argument boils down to: “You don’t want to read this like the papists do, do you?” If your only exegetical tool is warning people not to read the Bible like Catholics, that’s not scholarship—that’s bias masquerading as commentary.

Real exegesis means drawing out what’s already in the text, entering into the thought world of the writer. Eisegesis is reading into the text what isn’t there.

Paul’s Casual Approach Shows This Was Normal Practice

Here’s something that strikes me every time I read this passage: notice how casual Paul is about it. He doesn’t say, “Now hold on, I’m gonna say something really controversial here.” He just naturally writes, “May he find mercy on that Day.” It reads like run-of-the-mill practice in Paul’s thought world.

If Paul is praying for a dead person here, then in his worldview—in the worldview of the early Church—such a thing would be completely normal. And of course it would be! Prayer for the dead is explicit in 2 Maccabees 12:43-46. Protestants reject these books, but God put 2 Timothy 1:16, 18 in the canon that everyone accepts. It’s almost as if God knew this argument would come up.

The Catholic Package: It All Holds Together

This is what I love about Catholic theology: it’s integrated. We’re not proof-texting here just to score a point against Protestants. Rather, the Catholic view of salvation, what happens after death, purgatory, the communion of saints, how we can continue to minister to each other even after death—all of these theological ideas come together as a package. Paul praying for the dead is like a domino: it indicates he believed other things about what happens after death, things that are consistent with Catholic teaching.

And here’s the irony: Sola Scriptura doesn’t work here. Protestant commentators who claim “Bible alone” as their rule of faith disagree with each other about what this text says. Some say Onesiphorus is dead, some say alive. The Bible alone doesn’t settle it—which is precisely why we need the Church’s interpretive authority.

The Bottom Line

2 Timothy 1:16, 18 shows Paul praying for Onesiphorus, who appears to be dead. Many Protestant commentators admit this. Others resort to circular reasoning or “papist” scare tactics instead of actual exegesis.

Prayer for the dead makes sense only if purgatory exists. Paul’s casual tone shows this was normal practice in his worldview. Catholic theology holds together as an integrated package: purgatory, the communion of saints, prayers for the dead—all connected.

This is not a Catholic add-on. This is Paul. This is Scripture. Biblical Christianity and Catholicism are synonyms for the same thing.